In this episode, myself and fellow Rant author 'John' (Craig) discuss wiretapping and liberties, conscription and the minimum wage.
Episode 2 coming soon.
In this episode, myself and fellow Rant author 'John' (Craig) discuss wiretapping and liberties, conscription and the minimum wage.
Episode 2 coming soon.
Got this from the Devil's Kitchen...
Tough fucking shit: if you bastards didn't want to be punished, then you shouldn't have stolen as much as you possibly could, should you? But you did: so suck it up, you fucks.
Believe you me, you thieving sacks of shit, Sir Christopher Kelly's recommendations are far more lenient than those that I would have levied: mine would have made the Star Chamber look like fucking Alton Towers, and would probably have involved cutting your salaries by 75%, banning all expenses, shoving sharpened cockroaches up your pissholes, putting half of you in prison and hanging the other half from the nearest tree.
You dishonest bastards got off very, very lightly.
Couldn't have put it better myself.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY BLOG!
Never mind that it was last week and I forgot... I'll give you a makeover soon...
I truly am sorry, but I kind of have to veer back to the politics for this one...
So the government has sacked the chief scientist employed to advise them on drug-related topics. Smooth. Because, of course, every twit in parliament is a chemist and obviously knows the consequences of drug use better than the top guy in the country. Now it seems to me that this chap was employed to advise them on drugs, and that is what he did. He told no lies - he just reported the facts. But he was sacked. Now if the government sacked a man for doing his job, what can we do to the government? Because as far as I can tell, those arses haven't done their jobs for a long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long time.
One Tory Twat said scientists 'know their place' in areas such as this. In my feeble opinion the scientists place is in fact to essentially make the damn policy, because you know nothing you fate, useless, deformed waster of air. You know your place pal, away from me, because if I got my hands on you now I'd see to it you'd be relying on drugs yourself for quite a while.
I hope they all resign in protest.
Back to the political thing for some humourous stuff on libertarianism...
Libertarians oppose the Iraq War, the War on Drugs, the War on Poverty, the War on War, and most other wars because wars are when poor people die for the benefit of rich people. They support, however, the War on the State - which, they assure us, will be launched "any day now". Libertarians also fornicate with anarchists.
Libertarians do, however, support the war on child pornography. Sociologists have long puzzled over this, arguing that either prohibitionism and criminalisation are evils or they are not, and that if the state has no right to intervene with people turning themselves into drooling thieving vegetables through chemical amusement aids, then it clearly should have no right to monitor and bug people's computers.
However the real reason for their objections appears to be that,at the moment, (unlike the drugs market) there is little hope of financial returns for investment in the Paedo pound. The other principle argument being that "unlimited consumer choice" should not be extended to (in scientific/rational terms) "filthy paedo scum who should be strung up with the commies." Of course the commie who wrote the previous statement is a dumb piece of shit because there would totally be a market for child porn if it was legal. Look how many people are on 4chan.
As the child porn market has extended however, there seems to be a rethink going on. (cf. Mary Ruwart: "Hey, kids have always screwed adults what's the big deal, they have a right to own their bodies and, hey, we all make mistakes." and Sean Gabb:" Hey, relax guys child porn is only child exploitation in the name of profit. Big deal, I've got a pair of shoes made by 5 year old Siberian orphans and I would think that being banged in a warm studio would be far preferable to them than being forced to operate that kind of machinery.") So, perhaps there is a chance that all those big fat corporate executives who currently blow Cocaine out of their backsides whilst banging their way through the infant population of Thailand and Sri Lanka will also soon feel the touch of Liberty's hand on their shoulders. Let's hope so, eh?
The typical "modern libertarian" is an anti-government, beer-drinking, crack-smoking, gun-toting, bomb-making, orgy-participating, porn-loving, South Park-watching, straight, male, American "don't fuck with me" motherfucker, who lives with his mom and hates the state. Cheap sex, deadly flavors of the evil weed known as pot, and the latest and greatest style of handguns being available in every convenience store wouldn't concern a libertarian in the least. Libertarians are also known for opposing those evil commies, prudish Christians, and Arab types who seek to tyrannize the world with economic and personal repression based on dumb religious values and compassion paid for with other people's money. This includes, in the US: the Democrats, Republicans and the Quakers, and in the UK: the Labour Party, the Conservative Party and the French.
I hate to admit: that's me!